CM80-60 series targets challenging products with its largest working area and 800 kN clamping force.
CM75-50 series targets balanced capacity and process control with larger forming capability.
CM70-45 series targets fast cycles, stable quality, and low waste with its tilting mold structure.
Quick Summary: Tilt mold thermoforming machines accelerate product discharge by tilting the lower mold block; they heat and shape plastic sheets to provide high cycles, precise forms, and organized stacking in packaging and food container production.
The hardest thing in mass production is not "speed"; it is repeating that speed with the same quality in every shift. Tilt Mold Thermoforming Machines answer this need with a tilting mold approach that makes mold movement more controlled. For high-volume products like plastic cups, yogurt containers, and bowls; this category is the right starting point for facilities seeking organized output, low waste, and production standards.
You can think of thermoforming simply as "forming with heat": heating a plastic sheet and shaping it in a mold. All solutions in this category are based on a thermoforming machine infrastructure; the point of difference is the more controlled process flow designed through the tilting motion. This accelerates product discharge, makes end-of-line organization predictable, and ensures that integrations such as automatic stacking/packaging operate more stably.
Plastic Cup Machine investments typically have clear goals: cycle stability + organized stacking + low waste.
In products like Yogurt Container Production Lines, the expectation for "same rim, same form, same order" is even more visible.
The tilt mold approach strengthens process control by making the position of the mold more manageable within the process flow. In practice, this contributes to more organized product discharge/transport scenarios, reduces risks of mixing and accumulation at the end of the line, and can lower waste rates in specific product types. Especially for lines targeting automatic stacking and packaging integration, "organized output" may seem like a small detail but it is an effect that scales total efficiency.
In modern production, balancing traceability through the Industry 4.0 approach, recipe management via the PLC control unit, and energy efficiency at the target cycle makes the purchasing decision more measurable and secure.
In the field, the difference between two machines in the same category is sometimes created not by "big headlines," but by small details that affect operation. If you ask the following questions clearly when requesting a quote, you will be able to read the capacity–waste–energy balance faster.
What accelerates series selection is matching technical data with "product reality." As product size increases, mold/forming area and clamping force gain importance; for more compact jobs, higher cycles and lower energy consumption may stand out.
Advantageous for large and challenging products with the widest working area and high clamping force.
Product Page:
CM80-60 Series
The mid-segment balance model; while area and forming capability increase, the cycle approach is stability-focused.
Product Page:
CM75-50 Series
Stands out in scenarios with more compact jobs and more aggressive cycle targets.
Product Page:
CM70-45 Series
While the three series share the same tilt mold logic, their characters are clearly distinct: CM70-45 stands out with a high cycle target for more compact jobs (highest cycle in the table), and its energy consumption remains relatively low. CM75-50 can be thought of as the "balance model"; the mold/forming area grows, and with 500 kN clamping force and increased depth capability, it opens up to a wider product portfolio. On the CM80-60 side, the scale grows: 600 kN clamping force and the widest working area provide advantages in large and challenging products; naturally, energy requirements are planned at the highest level.
The table below shows the three series side-by-side in core metrics that make decision-making easier.
| Technical Criteria | CM80-60 | CM75-50 | CM70-45 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum Mold Area | 1050 x 620 mm | 1000 x 520 mm | 950 x 520 mm |
| Maximum Forming Area | 800 x 600 mm | 750 x 500 mm | 700 x 450 mm |
| Maximum Capacity | 40 Cycles | 40 Cycles | 45 Cycles |
| Clamping Force | 800 kN | 500 kN | 400 kN |
| Max Positive Depth | 20 mm | 20 mm | 10 mm |
| Max Negative Depth | 180 mm | 180 mm | 150 mm |
| Raw Materials | PP-PET-PS-OPS-PLA-CPET-PVC | PP-PET-PS-OPS-PLA-CPET-PVC | PP-PET-PS-OPS-PLA-CPET-PVC |
| Total Energy Consumption | 60 - 70 kW | 60 - 70 kW | 50 - 60 kW |
| Total Installed Power | 280 kW | 270 kW | 250 kW |
| Pressure | 8 Bar | 8 Bar | 8 Bar |
The "right machine type" for every facility may differ depending on the production flow. If the cutting logic of the product or the need to scale the line flow with stations in high-volume production is decisive in your process, checking the following two categories completes the right picture.
When you want to scale the line flow with stations in high-volume production, the multi-station structure provides a serious advantage. It is a powerful alternative for facilities where cycle discipline and end-of-line organization are priorities.
If cutting quality and repeatable tolerances are your priority, the in-mold cutting approach can make a serious difference. It is a strong option for jobs where the expectation for "same rim, same form, same order" is high in mass production.
For technical information requests, you can contact us through our communication channels.